Scrooge Banks Will Gouge Canadians and
Cut
Services to Recover Their $16 Billion in Losses and Writedowns Unless
Federal
Government Finally Audits Charges, Interest Rates, Lending Records and
Competition
Levels
New Financial Consumer Watchdog Groups Needed to Watch Banks
and
Investment Industry
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
OTTAWA - With Canada’s big banks reporting a total of $16
billion
dollars in losses and writedowns mainly because of their irresponsibly
risky
investments, Canada’s leading bank accountability coalition called on
federal
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty to work with opposition parties and
protect
financial consumers by requiring banks to prove their credit card,
other consumer
and small- and medium-sized business loan interest rates and service
charges
do not amount to gouging, empowering the Competition Bureau to evaluate
the
lending record and competition level in basic banking services
nation-wide,
and requiring banks and other financial institutions to facilitate the
creation
of watchdog groups.
The Canadian Community Reinvestment Coalition (CCRC), established in
1997
and made up of 100 citizen groups from across Canada with a collective
membership
of more than three million citizens, proposes first that the
federal
government empower and mandate the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada
(FCAC)
to examine for the past 10 years, and annually in the future, the
levels of
profit of the credit card and basic consumer and small business loan
divisions
of the banks and other federally regulated companies, as well as
profits from
basic banking service charges.
The FCAC would keep key company information confidential, reporting
only
the profit margin for these divisions of each company. If the
FCAC found
excessive profits (above the corporate average of 15-20 percent), the
public
would know, and likely that pressure alone would cause interest rates
and
service charges to drop. (To see details about this
proposal, click here)
Second, the federal government must order the
Competition
Bureau to audit the lending records of the banks (by tracking number of
applications,
number of approvals/rejections, and number of called loans in all
consumer
and small and medium-sized business loan categories), and to evaluate
the
actual level of basic banking service competition in communities across
Canada,
for the past 10 years.
Third, the federal government must require the banks and
other
federally regulated financial institutions to enclose twice each year
in their
mailings to customers a one-page pamphlet that invites them to join a
financial
consumer watchdog group. The federal government must also do the
same
for all federally incorporated companies, requiring them to enclose a
one-page
pamphlet in their annual mailing to individual shareholders that
invites them to join an investor watchdog
group.
This method has been used successfully in four states in the U.S. to
form
broad-based, self-sustaining watchdog groups for utilities.
Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has talked a lot about ensuring
Canadians
are charged fair prices for banking, but has done nothing except meet
with
bankers behind closed doors a few times, and give them a
no-strings-attached
$95 billion total subsidy.
"No corporation has a right to gouge or cut services,
especially
when providing an essential service such as banking or trying to recoup
self-caused
losses like the banks are suffering from, so the least the Conservative
government
can do is protect Canadians from being gouged or losing their loans by
requiring
banks to prove their consumer and business loan interest rates and
charges
are fair, and by auditing bank loan records and banking competition in
communities
across Canada," said Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch
and
Chairperson of the CCRC. Every survey done in the past decade has
shown
90 percent of Canadians believe banking is a service essential for
functioning
in society.
"To balance the marketplace and lobbying power of Canada’s big
banks and investment companies, the federal government must also,
finally,
implement the recommendations of the 1998 task force and House and
Senate
committees by requiring financial and investment companies to
distribute
a pampblet in their mailings to customers and investors that invites
them
to join citizen watchdog groups to watch over the financial industry
and
federal government," said Conacher. "At little or no cost
to
the federal government or the financial services industry, consumers
and
investors can be given a very easy way to band together to help and
protect
themselves through forming their own watchdog groups."
According to Fortune magazine’s 2007 Global 500 report (based
on
FY 2006 annual reports), Canada’s big five banks were all within the
top 35
banks in the world in terms of profits as a percentage of revenues, and
profits
as a percentage of assets (before their irresponsible investing led to
billions
of dollars of losses and writedowns in the past two years).
In addition to having the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada
(FCAC)
examine profit levels for credit cards and service charges for the past
decade
and annually in the future (To see details about this proposal, click here), and the
Competition
Bureau examine lending records and competition levels across Canada for
the
past decade and annually in the future (To see details about the
U.S.
requires this under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), click
here -- To see
details about the $4.5 trillion in reinvestments that have resulted
from the
CRA since 1977 (in a PDF-format document), click
here -- To see the CCRC's position paper describing how
this
bank accountability system should work, click here), the federal
government
should finally actually regulate Canada’s banks and investment
companies
through the following actions:
- If the FCAC study shows gouging in the past decade,
require banks
to refund customers;
- If the Competition Bureau shows lack of competition in any
community,
require banks to open branches or subsidize credit unions opening
branches;
- Require banks to provide detailed information on loans,
investments
and services to customers, require corrective action and deny mergers
and
takeovers if banks are not meeting customer needs, as in the U.S.
- Every government in Canada contracts money-handling and
credit card
business to the banks, and should award contracts based on which bank
serves
the most people well;
- Facilitate the creation of a Financial Consumer
Organization (FCO)
and an Individual Investor Organization (IIO) to help consumers
by requiring
banks and other financial institutions to enclose an FCO or IIO
pamphlet
in their mailings to customers, inviting people to join the watchdog
groups
(To see the CCRC's position paper describing the FCO proposal in
detail, click here -- NOTE:
Creating
such an organization using the pamphlet method was recommended by the Task Force on the Future of the
Canadian
Financial Services Sector recommended in its September 1998
Report
(See Recommendation #56(b) on page 208 of the Report), and the
House
of Commons and Senate committees that reviewed the report endorsed the
recommendation);
- Require banks to give customers access to their money as
soon as
a cheque clears (as 98 percent of cheques in Canada clear in one day),
and;
- Increase the maximum penalty for violating the Bank Act to
$50 million (currently, the maximum penalty is $200,000, much too low
to encourage compliance),
and require the FCAC to disclose the name of violators in every case.
"The federal government has allowed a two-tier banking system
to
operate in Canada where the people who can least afford it pay more for
essential
basic banking services and basic credit. Any government that
wants to
help Canadians with low incomes, and help the Canadian economy overall,
will
regulate Canada’s big banks to ensure they serve everyone well at fair
prices."
said Conacher.
- 30 -
For more information contact:
Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch
Chairperson of the CCRC
Tel: (613) 789-5753
To see the CCRC's analysis of Bill C-37, which changed
the Bank Act and other federal financial institution
laws,
and passed into law in April 2007, click
here
|